Notice of administration to california franchise tax board
There are so many notice requirements in a probate. Here are some of my notes from the proabte seminar I gave this week. This focuses on some of the notice requirements you need to be aware of. Contact me with questions. -John
- Notice to Creditors, Beneficiaries and State Agencies – What Is Required
PRACTICE POINTER: Always err on the side of caution. If there is a question if they should be put on notice I recommend putting them on notice.
- The PR is responsible for putting many people, entities and agencies on notice of the probate estate. There are timing issues as to when you put them on notice.
- In addition to this specific mailed notice, of course, publication is required in the city where the decedent resided prior to the Court issuing Letters to a PR. It should be noted that the publication requirement is NOT satisfied by publication in the county and, in fact, some Court’s do look for publication in the actual city the decedent resided in (PC 8121) so be careful with your newspaper selection.
- Pursuant to PC 9050 the PR should put “known or reasonably ascertained creditors” of the decedent on notice of the probate administration. When advising the PR I send them a list, as an example, of potential creditors that includes the following:
a. The hospital or rest home, if any, where the decedent died.
b. All physicians or other health-care providers who treated the decedent.
c. All ambulance companies used.
d. The landlord (if decedent rented) or mortgage holder (if decedent owned property).
e. All employees and providers of services (gardener, cook, accountant, maid, etc.).
f. Utility companies (gas, water, electricity, telephone, cable television, etc.).
g. Note payees (may be found by reviewing tax returns for the list of interest deductions).
h. All credit card companies (also return any credit cards cut in half at the time the notice is given).
i. Anyone who sends a bill to the decedent.
j. Any securities broker who may have a margin account or other obligation due.
k. Those interested in the decedent’s guaranties or contingent liabilities, which may appear on any financial statements of the decedent.
l. Creditors of the decedent’s business if it appears likely that there may have been personal guaranties or if the business is not incorporated.
- I typically recommend putting taxing agencies on notice including the California Franchise Tax Board, the IRS, county tax collector and any other tax collector that may be applicable for a certain decedent. The notice to the Franchise Tax Board is now required in probates within 90 days of letters issuing (PC 9202).
- It is good practice to always put the county tax assessor (or tax collector) on notice of the probate as there can be a reassessment and/or supplemental tax bill after death. This comes up in a case where the beneficiary, or heir at law, does not qualify for parent-child (or grandparent-grandchild) exclusion from reassessment or the proper form was not filed. (BOTH ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT JBP-5) I put the assessor on notice by filing the Estate Change in Ownership Statement (ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT JBP-2) and I file the parent-child exclusion form as soon as I ascertain who will be receiving the real property.
REALLY IMPORTANT PRACTICE POINTER: In all cases a parent-child (or grandparent-grandchild) exclusion form should be filed PRIOR TO REAL PROPERTY BEING SOLD and within 3 years of transfer (death). This is especially important in probate estates (and trust administrations) where you are selling the property as you will inadvertently create a large supplemental tax bill if you don’t file before the real property is sold.
- One other entity that it is important to put on notice is the California Department of Health Services (Medi-Cal). Notice (FORM ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT JBP-6) shall be sent to the DHS along with a copy of the death certificate for the decedent and any predeceased spouse. Such notice shall be sent within 90 days of issuance of Letters. DHS then has 4 months to file a claim. Typically they reply with a letter stating there was no usage by anybody with that social security number. In some cases they reply with a detailed bill of Medi-Cal use. As the government tends to be a priority claimant it is important to establish if the bill is correct and if the government is entitled to collection on that claim. There are situations when Medi-Cal is not entitled to reimbursement; for example, when any of the decedent’s heirs at law are disabled or if the decedent received Medi-Cal coverage before age 55.
PRACTICE POINTER: When in doubt put them on notice! I always suggest to my clients that they put everybody on official notice of administration of the estate by sending the Notice of Administration form with a blank creditor’s claim form. I recommend doing this to heirs at law, beneficiaries and anybody who may have expended money before or after death in regards to the decedent or her estate. I often put the PR herself on notice in case they have to file a creditor’s claim in the estate for some reason. The bottom line, to me, I want to know who all creditors are so when the probate ends I know my client, the PR, does not have anything to worry about!
Search
Archives
- September 2024 (2)
- July 2024 (5)
- May 2024 (2)
- April 2024 (4)
- March 2024 (2)
- February 2024 (1)
- January 2024 (4)
- December 2023 (1)
- May 2023 (1)
- March 2023 (1)
- February 2023 (1)
- January 2023 (1)
- December 2022 (1)
- October 2022 (2)
- September 2022 (1)
- August 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (1)
- April 2022 (3)
- September 2021 (1)
- August 2021 (1)
- May 2021 (1)
- April 2021 (1)
- February 2021 (1)
- January 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (5)
- November 2020 (3)
- October 2020 (4)
- September 2020 (1)
- August 2020 (3)
- July 2020 (4)
- June 2020 (4)
- May 2020 (3)
- April 2020 (25)
- March 2020 (8)
- February 2020 (1)
- January 2020 (2)
- December 2019 (1)
- November 2019 (2)
- October 2019 (4)
- May 2019 (2)
- April 2019 (2)
- March 2019 (2)
- February 2019 (2)
- January 2019 (1)
- December 2018 (1)
- November 2018 (2)
- October 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (3)
- August 2018 (4)
- April 2018 (2)
- March 2018 (4)
- February 2018 (1)
- January 2018 (4)
- December 2017 (1)
- October 2017 (1)
- September 2017 (1)
- August 2017 (1)
- June 2017 (1)
- April 2017 (1)
- March 2017 (2)
- February 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (2)
- December 2016 (2)
- November 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (2)
- August 2016 (1)
- July 2016 (1)
- June 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (1)
- March 2016 (1)
- February 2016 (1)
- January 2016 (1)
- December 2015 (3)
- November 2015 (2)
- October 2015 (1)
- September 2015 (1)
- July 2015 (1)
- June 2015 (1)
- May 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (1)
- March 2015 (2)
- February 2015 (2)
- January 2015 (1)
- December 2014 (1)
- November 2014 (1)
- October 2014 (1)
- September 2014 (1)
- August 2014 (3)
- June 2014 (2)
- May 2014 (2)
- April 2014 (1)
- March 2014 (3)
- February 2014 (2)
- January 2014 (7)
- December 2013 (2)
- November 2013 (2)
- October 2013 (4)
- September 2013 (4)
- August 2013 (2)
- July 2013 (8)
- June 2013 (5)
- May 2013 (5)
- April 2013 (9)
- March 2013 (5)
- February 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (7)
- December 2012 (10)
- November 2012 (9)
- October 2012 (10)
- September 2012 (9)
- August 2012 (23)
- July 2012 (20)
- June 2012 (19)
- May 2012 (37)
- April 2012 (31)
- March 2012 (27)
- February 2012 (20)
- January 2012 (24)
- December 2011 (30)
- November 2011 (18)
- October 2011 (33)
- September 2011 (45)
- August 2011 (16)
- July 2011 (2)
- June 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (5)
- April 2011 (5)
- March 2011 (2)
- December 2010 (4)
- November 2010 (1)
- October 2010 (2)
- September 2010 (1)
- August 2010 (2)
- July 2010 (3)
- June 2010 (2)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (1)
- March 2010 (2)
- February 2010 (2)
- January 2010 (4)
- December 2009 (3)
- November 2009 (3)
© California Probate Attorney